It’s such a shame that the first series of this was so silly, and made it a bit of a laughing stock, because it really has improved … and now this, set at the end of the 1670s, and featuring (yay!!) the early days of chocolate consumption across Europe, is going to be the last series, meaning that we won’t get all the exciting stuff that lies just ahead. (Or, indeed, see what happens to the Parisian proletarian with the Manchester accent.) 1683, the Siege of Vienna. 1685, the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes. 1688, the Glorious Revolution, and the departure of James II and VII to Paris. 1688-1697, the Nine Years’ War. 1701-1714, the War of the Spanish Succession. Yes, all right, all right, I do know that, apart from the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes, none of those events actually took place in France, but Louis XIV was up to his neck in some of it, and the fact that he wasn’t up to his neck in the rest of it was arguably crucial as well.
And they’ve scrapped the “Inside Versailles” add-on, whereby each episode used to be followed by a brief discussion of the historical background. OK, it was a bit patronising, but I still quite enjoyed it.
This third and final series of Versailles opens at the end of the Franco-Dutch War of 1672-78, with Philippe, Duke of Orleans, returning as a war hero. I have always disliked Philippe, because I’ve always thought of him as Minette (Princess Henriette Anne of England and Scotland)’s baddie husband who treated her badly and was alleged (admittedly unfairly) to have had her poisoned. However, I have actually softened towards him because of the way he’s portrayed in this by Alexander Vlahos – we’re getting the lighter side of him, but we’re also getting to see his intelligence and his military prowess. And maybe this is the first time I’ve really seen him from the French viewpoint – it is rather hard not to look at things primarily from an English viewpoint when you’re reading English history books! Unfortunately, in this series his main storyline seems to be an obsession with the Man in the Iron Mask. OK, there was a prisoner in an iron mask, but he had nothing to do with Philippe and I don’t know what the scriptwriters had to bring him into this for.
And then we’ve got Guillaume, the cobbler who fought alongside Philippe – played by our very own Matthew McNulty. And his sister, played by Jenny Platt, aka Violet, the former Coronation Street barmaid who had a baby with her GBF Sean Tully and then went off with Mike Baldwin’s grandson. They’re fictitious, but they do represent Parisian life outside the court, and I’m quite enjoying their story. If “enjoying” is the word, given that the life of the lower classes under the ancient regime wasn’t really much fun.
Back at court, various Austrian Habsburgs, notably the Emperor Leopold himself, are visiting. The Holy Roman Empire was allied with the Dutch during the war of the 1670s, and are now in a very weak position … and, come the 1680s, Louis is going to take advantage of that to conquer most of what’s now Luxembourg, and is going to do absolutely nothing to help the Empire in arguably the biggest crisis in its history, the Ottoman Siege of Vienna in 1683. The Poles are going to claim all the credit for driving the Ottomans off, which always annoys me because Eugene of Savoy deserves far more credit than he’s actually going to get. But we aren’t going to see that, because this is the final series. Boo!!
And we’re already getting all the talk about Charles II of Spain, his medical problems and his lack of an heir, and the fact that both the French and the Austrians (the Bavarians haven’t been mentioned) have got an eye on grabbing Spain for themselves. This will ultimately lead to the War of the Spanish Succession, which will see Britain surpass France as the world’s leading military power (hurrah!), Madrid and Barcelona at each other’s throats (some things never change), and Sicily, Sardinia and roughly-what’s-now-Belgium, not to mention parts of Canada, being passed about like parcels. Oh, and the building of Blenheim Palace. But we’re not going to get that far. Gah!!
We also have the Huguenot lady doing a lot of preaching at court. Come 1685, Louis will revoke the Edict of Nantes, promulgated by Henri IV – “Paris is worth a Mass” – in 1598. Hundreds of thousands of Huguenots will leave France. Some of them will end up in Manchester. And Bolton. And Halifax. Oh, and London. And various other parts of Britain. Others will end up in North America, in South Africa, and in various mainly Protestant parts of mainland Europe. It’s a major population movement. The right of return – no, that it not a 20th or 21st century thing – was granted in 1790, during the Revolutionary period, and was reiterated in 1889 , but it was a bit late by then. It really is a very important part of European and world history. But we’re not going to get that far. I keep saying that.
The Revocation of the Edict of Nantes, and the fact that Louis had thoroughly annoyed William of Orange by defeating him in the war of the 1670s and then barging around in parts of the Low Countries in the early 1680s, were two of the contributory factors in the Glorious Revolution. Yes, OK, I know that it wasn’t very glorious for either the Scottish Highlands or most of Ireland, but it was probably a pretty good thing for England, Wales and the Scottish Lowlands … er, and this isn’t the time for the de facto/de jure/social contract/whatever debate. Louis did actually offer to send an army to help James, but James said no. However, he did have French help when he landed in Ireland in 1689, at the start of the campaign which would end in the Battle of the Boyne. And French support for the Jacobites would remain an issue throughout the Nine Years’ War (which was fought in America, as well as in Europe) and beyond.
Obviously the Glorious Revolution and its aftermath is a rather sensitive subject in Scottish and Irish history, and I don’t think any TV company would choose to cover it from the viewpoint of either James or William for that reason, but it could have been covered from a French angle. Sorry, I know that sounds ridiculously Anglocentric! But no. There will be no season four.
Boo. Mind you, the scriptwriters would probably have chosen to ignore all of this, and write about nude paintings or mysterious prisoners, or Athenais de Montespan, with whom they seem to be rather obsessed, instead. However, the departure of Athenais for a convent did put Louis in such a strop that – I assume this was fictional, but it was good!- he ordered one of his lackeys to organise a big party featuring something special, and the something special turned out to be “the medicine of the Aztecs” – chocolate! Drinking chocolate, at this point. It became popular in Spain after the conquest of the Aztec Empire, and then spread (chocolate spread … sorry, bad pun) across Europe. Chocolate bars only really got going in the mid-19th century, thanks to Fry’s of Bristol, who later merged with Cadbury’s. I now appear to have got completely off the point, but chocolate is always worth writing about.
It’s not exactly been brilliant, and I don’t suppose this series is going to get that much better. And some of the early episodes were just cringeworthy. But it’s such an important, and, in English, often neglected, period of history that I really would have liked to see it carry on throughout the whole of the reign of Louis XIV. But, alas, it is not to be. Maybe console yourself with a cup of hot chocolate?
6 thoughts on “Versailles (final season) – BBC 2”
James II didn’t end up in Paris, but in Saint-Germain-en-Laye, where he resided in a magnificent chateau. The chateau’s park was later sold off for residential development – and what a delightful residential area it is: nicer than Hampstead and even . . . wait for it . . . . Manchester!
St Germain classes as Paris – the football team’s named after it! I’ve never been to that part of Paris, though: it sounds very nice 🙂 .
Yes, the Saint Germain in PSG is indeed Saint Germain-en-Laye, which is 19 km to the west of Paris and not regarded as part of the capital by the locals. Saint-Germain-des-Pres is part of Paris, which may account for the confusion.
Roman Abramovich did once threaten to rename Chelsea as London Chelsea, but decided not to bother :-).
Not quite pertinent. PSG is an amalgamation of two football clubs (Paris and Saint-Germain-en-Laye). I’ve no idea why Abramovich would consider renaming Chelsea. Anyway, your’s is by far the best blog on the net. I always read your posts with great interest. They are invariably intelligent and insightful. Please continue!
Aww, thank you!