This is the final book in Carol McGrath’s trilogy about unpopular medieval queens of England; and it’s about Isabella of France, who’s probably better-known than either Eleanor of Provence or Eleanor of Castile. The title relates to a fictional character who’s the daughter of a stonemason, but it’s an odd choice. It rather makes the reader imagine Isabella singing alongside Ian Brown, maybe about how her glorious marriage to the English heir turned out to be fools’ gold, or about telling Roger Mortimer that she wanna be adored …er, right, let’s leave it there, because “This Is The One” and “Waterfall” are both used as football songs at Old Trafford, and that’s all a bit painful at the moment and I’m just hoping that Erik ten Hag’s tenure will see The Resurrection.
OK, OK, Isabella of France. You know the story. The She-Wolf of France and her lover, Roger Mortimer, overthrow her gay husband, Edward II, and get someone to murder him by shoving a red hot poker up … well, you know that bit of the story without my having to spell it out. Then they’re overthrown in turn, when her son, Edward III, takes control. And there’s that thing about the Scottish bloke in the cave with the spider. However, most of what we think we know about those times is what was written years later. What actually happened? Well, we know the basics, that Edward became unpopular because of the defeat at Bannockburn and the influence of his favourites, and that he was deposed by Isabella and Mortimer, but we don’t really know the detail.
Carol McGrath’s done a very good job of creating a novel from what did happen and what may have happened. My one real issue with it is that it’s too short. There’s a huge amount of English political history in the book, plus a certain amount of social history, plus some nice little titbits about fashions, the growing popularity of knitting and life at court, plus some of the history of France at the time – she doesn’t go into the dissolution of the Templars et al, but she does include the history of the Capetians, as they were Isabella’s family – and that, alongside the development of the characters and their relationships with each other, is a lot to fit into a novel of fewer than 400 pages. But saying that you wish a book had been longer is surely a great compliment to it.
Incidentally, we don’t see Robert the Bruce, with or without his spider. I just mentioned that story because I like it!
There’s a fairly recent theory that Edward II escaped to Italy. We don’t actually know. It’s not talked about very much. The Princes in the Tower seem to have cornered the market as far as royal mysteries and conspiracy theories go. But there is a theory. On top of that, the term “She-Wolf” wasn’t used about Isabella until Elizabethan times, and it really isn’t clear from the sources from the time whether Isabella and Mortimer were lovers, nor whether Edward and Piers Gaveston were lovers, nor whether Edward and the younger Hugh Despenser were lovers. There’s also the fact that, whilst Edward was probably bisexual, people in the Middle Ages didn’t really identify as straight, gay, bisexual or anything else related to sexuality. As for Bannockburn (and this book doesn’t actually show Robert the Bruce, with or without a spider), yes, it was a disaster, but Edward II’s reputation’s also suffered from being his sandwiched in between Edward I and Edward III, whose reigns both saw huge military success. Pretty hard to compete with those two.
This book is generally very, very good. Yes, it’s sympathetic towards Isabella, and it makes the point (perhaps a little too often) that she was a strong, independent woman, but it’s not overly biased against Edward. Someone once said that Charles I was “a very silly man”. So was Edward II. He allowed himself to be overly influenced by Gaveston and the Despensers, and, because of that, he became alienated from his wife, from other members of his family, and from the nobility in general. He was a weak man, with very little common sense and that’s what this book shows. Isabella is shown not as a “she-wolf” but as an intelligent woman who wasn’t willing to be dominated by men … which, unfortunately, is how some men would define a “she-wolf”. Does any strong, independent woman risk being labelled a “She-Wolf”? Maybe not a She-Wolf, but female politicians are inevitably labelled “bossy” and “domineering”. Isabella’s certainly not shown as being callous and calculating, and I think that that’s fair enough.
There are also various sub-plots. One involves Agnes, the fictional character mentioned above, and her future husband Gregory. The main plot only covers the period from 1311 to 1330: Agnes and Gregory, in 1352, tell the reader what happens after that. Another is the story of the Tour de Nesle affair, which saw her two sisters-in-law and their alleged lovers executed. And another is the story of the de Clare sisters, who all played prominent roles at Edward II’s court. And then there’s the romance between the future Edward III and Philippa of Hainault.
Overall, it’s a fascinating book. The history’s spot on, insofar as it can be – I won’t give away which versions of events Carol McGrath chooses for her book – ,the characters come across well, and there’s a lot going on. As I said, my one and only real criticism of it is that it needed to be a bit longer.
3 thoughts on “The Stone Rose by Carol McGrath”
I enjoyed this, but I agree that it’s a lot of history to fit into a book of this length!
LikeLiked by 1 person
So was Edward II the father of Edward III or could it have been Roger Mortimer?
Lovely post 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person