I recently went on a Christmas markets break to Geneva, and got the train to Montreux – how Girls’ Own-ish is that, travelling round Switzerland 🙂 ? – and, as the train drew into Vevey, I immediately thought about Amy and Laurie. Little Women‘s that sort of book: a lot of people know it so well that bits of it come to mind all the time. So it must be quite hard to make that into a stage show, especially when you’re trying to fit Little Women and Good Wives into under 2 1/2 hours, with a cast of only 8 people. Inevitably, some scenes and even whole plotlines are going to have to be left out. But all the really iconic moments were there. Taking the food round to the Hummels. Amy falling through the ice. Jo selling her hair. Meg saying yes to John Brooke. And, of course, Beth dying 😦 .
The younger girls were aged a bit. They had to have the same actresses playing them all the way through, so fair enough, but it was rather confusing that Beth and Amy were both taller than Meg! Aunt March was given some comedy value. And Marmee was de-sanctified and made more human, which worked really well. No dead canaries!
The character of Hannah was completely omitted, but I think that was more due to the limited cast than a desire to avoid showing the Marches having a servant … although we were told several times that the Laurences ran a business and Laurie had to work in it. Mr Laurence had been bumped off before the story started, which was a shame – I like his grandfatherly relationship with Beth. The bits about Amy’s problems at school were left out. I’ve still never had a pickled lime. I really must try one some time. And I’ve still never read Pilgrim’s Progress, which I’ve been meaning to do for over 40 years. My dad had to read it for English lit O-level. He wasn’t very impressed.
Pretty much everything about Meg and John’s married life – even including the wedding – was missed out, which I was sorry about. There are a lot of GO books about romance. There aren’t a lot about what it’s like when you’re on a limited budget, both partners are tired, and the kids are playing up. However, there just wasn’t time to fit everything in, and the main focus was put on Jo. And everything that was included really did come across very well – with a nice touch at the end, when Jo told Professor Bhaer that she’d play her part financially when they got married. The point about Jo’s penny dreadful stories paying the books was made quite forcefully, and the scene in which Amy tells Laurie to get his act together was done very well.
Poor Amy comes in for a lot of vitriol from readers. People seem to have this thing that she betrayed the sisterhood by stealing Jo’s man. She didn’t, OK! Jo had turned Laurie down, long before he and Amy got together!
I don’t really get Professor Bhaer, even when played by Gabriel Byrne in the 1994 film. I think a lot of the problem is that in Good Wives, and in The First Violin which was written at about the same time, German music and literature were seen as being very romantic. That idea was killed stone dead by the two world wars. Also, Professor Bhaer is 40 when Jo meets him. When I first read the book, aged about 7, 40 seemed pretty much equivalent to 100.
Speaking of wars, this production did make more of the wartime setting than the book did. Jo used some unparliamentary language about the Confederates. We were told that Mrs Hummel’s husband and eldest son were in the Union army. And part of the de-sanctifying of Marmee was a scene in which she said that the Hummel son had been killed at Bull Run, and his father badly wounded, and that Mrs Hummel had accepted it in a way she’d never be able to do if Mr March were killed. I wanted to howl that it couldn’t possibly be Bull Run/Manassas because that was five months before the first Christmas, but then I thought that, OK, it could legitimately be Second Bull Run/Manassas, which was eight months after the first Christmas!
I did go through a phase of finding some bits of the book irritating. I’ve already mentioned the dead canary! And was it really so bad for Meg to borrow a friend’s party frock because she wanted to look nice? And what was the point of all that virtue-signalling with having no Christmas presents? It wasn’t going to help the war effort, was it? But, when you think that Little Women‘s contemporaneous with the horrendous Elsie Dinsmore, and didn’t come all that long after the even more horrendous The Wide, Wide World, it really was an amazing achievement. Jo going to live in a boarding house in New York on her own was a very bold storyline. And, even though I don’t really get Professor Bhaer, I quite like the fact that Jo ends up with him, even though I think Louisa M Alcott would have preferred her to remain single.
All in all, this was a lovely pre-Christmas treat, in front of a packed (and about 95% female!) audience. Great stuff!