I’m not quite sure what I think about this book. It’s “reimagined” Joan of Arc as a tough, tomboyish, secular figure, who doesn’t have any religious visions and is brought to the attention of the Dauphin because she’s such a strong fighter. Some reviewers, notably the late Hilary Mantel, have praised the author for “recreating” Joan as a “woman for our time”, but surely you can’t just go around “recreating” historical figures to suit your own times. Joan was someone who claimed to have religious visions. That might not sit very easily with today’s secular world, but she didn’t live in today’s world: she lived 600 years ago.
The quality of writing’s pretty good, apart from being set in the present tense – that seems to be becoming more and more common, and it’s very annoying – and the book’s historically accurate in terms of political and military events. The story is that Joan is exceptionally tall, well-built and strong, is very tough from an early age as she has to defend herself against her violent father, and is very skilled with both a bow and arrow and a sword. She becomes imbued with a hatred of the English and Burgundians after her sister is raped by soldiers and later commits suicide. Then she’s, as I said, brought to the attention of the Dauphin because of her skill as a fighter. The famous scene in which she recognises the Dauphin without being told isn’t there at all: she’s just told who he is!
And there are no religious visions. Instead, the French leaders spread propaganda linking her with various prophecies, and the idea that she’s a holy woman spreads like wildfire, and she becomes a cult figure. But there’s a sense that she’s being used, and it’s made clear to her that, if the French start losing battles, she’ll be pushed aside and they’ll find someone else and present them as a holy figure instead. Joan isn’t bothered by that: she feels that she’s a strong leader. She participates in a number of battles, before being captured, and then the book rather strangely ends before she’s tried and burnt at the stake.
It’s not a bad book, but this isn’t Joan. As the author points out, she’s known to have been injured in battle, so she obviously was a soldier of sorts. And, whilst the book doesn’t mention it, one of the charges on which she was tried was wearing men’s clothes. But she’s described as having been quite petite, not big and tough. And she claimed to have been guided by religious visions, and asked to be taken to the Dauphin because of them. What happens in this book just isn’t what happened. People reinterpret historical figures because they don’t agree with the traditional interpretations of them, which is fine, but changing the actual history of a historical figure to suit yourself and your times isn’t fine. Hmm.
Like this:
Like Loading...